The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and since only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is unclear how it relates to any offered situation, usually rendering judgments based about the read more intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances on the case at hand. These decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common law traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs with the concerned officer to DPC properly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Knowledge of the accused is usually a matter to become inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging to be proved otherwise.”
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the greatest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to do, i.e. safe its citizens.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally regarded conviction. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system is just not without flaws: overhauling is overdue plus the legislation regarding murder calls for major reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be done is to make certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.